David Foley, Jr., et al v. Orange County
| DAVID WASH FOLEY, JR. and JENNIFER T. FOLEY |
| ORANGE COUNTY |
| 26-11488 |
| April 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Over the phone 30-day extension granted by clerk as to Appellant David Wash Foley, Jr. Appellant's brief is now due on 07/09/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 06/02/2026 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Foley, David Wash, Jr., and Foley, Jennifer T. Party David Wash Foley, Jr.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11488] (ECF: David Foley) [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Derek J. Angell for Appellee Orange County. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11488] (ECF: Derek Angell) [Entered: 05/21/2026 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Derek J. Angell for Orange County. Related cases? Yes. [26-11488] (ECF: Derek Angell) [Entered: 05/21/2026 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice that no action will be taken on Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Attorney Derek J. Angell for Appellee Orange County. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): An Appearance of Counsel form has not been filed, See 11th Cir. R. 46-5. [Entered: 05/21/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Derek J. Angell for Appellee Orange County. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11488] (ECF: Derek Angell) [Entered: 05/21/2026 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. You have failed to file the CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 05/21/2026 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 2 Briefing Notice issued to Appellants David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/09/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 04/30/2026 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants David Wash Foley, Jr. and Jennifer T. Foley on 04/30/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 04/30/2026 11:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.