Ramon Ruiz v. City of Miami Beach, et al
| RAMON RUIZ |
| CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, F. BOLANOS, B. VICENS, B. BELTRAN, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, NUSHIN SAYFIE, JUAN FERNANDEZ-BARQUIN, ROBIN WILSON FABER, JULIE HARRIS NELSON and SABRINA MARIA RICHARDSON |
| 26-11503 |
| April 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Ramon Ruiz is GRANTED by clerk [ # 3 ]. Pursuant to FRAP 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:03 AM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Ramon Ruiz. Motion is Unopposed. [3] [26-11503] (ECF: Ramon Ruiz) [Entered: 05/05/2026 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 05/01/2026 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ramon Ruiz on 04/29/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 05/01/2026 02:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
