George Luckett v. Brian Adams
| GEORGE LUCKETT |
| BRIAN ADAMS |
| SERVICE |
| 26-11513 |
| April 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: Appellants motion for leave to substitute counsel and to withdraw Attorney Noah Green is GRANTED. [ # 9 ] JP (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 06/16/2026 12:08 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Charles Cole for Appellant Brian Adams. Related cases? No. [26-11513] (ECF: Charles Cole) [Entered: 06/12/2026 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 11 Attorney Charles Cole for Appellant Brian Adams is notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files a Civil Appeal Statement. [Entered: 06/03/2026 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 10 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Charles Cole for Appellant Brian Adams. Appellants brief due on 07/08/2026 as to Appellant Brian Adams. Appendix due within 7 days of the filing of the brief as to Appellant Brian Adams. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 06/02/2026 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Noah Green for Appellant Brian Adams. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9] [26-11513] (ECF: Noah Green) [Entered: 06/02/2026 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Charles J. Cole for Brian Adams Related cases? No. [26-11513] (ECF: Charles Cole) [Entered: 06/01/2026 05:53 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Noah Green for Brian Adams. Related cases? No. [26-11513] (ECF: Noah Green) [Entered: 05/15/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Alex Scott Hertz for Appellee George Luckett. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11513] (ECF: Alex Hertz) [Entered: 05/14/2026 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice of deficient Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Noah Green for Brian Adams. All attorneys who wish to participate in this appeal must file an Appearance of Counsel Form. See 11th Cir. R. 46-6(b). [Entered: 05/12/2026 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Noah Green for Appellant Brian Adams. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11513] (ECF: Noah Green) [Entered: 05/08/2026 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Alex Scott Hertz for George Luckett. Related cases? No. [26-11513] (ECF: Alex Hertz) [Entered: 05/06/2026 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Brian Adams. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/08/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 05/05/2026 05:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Brian Adams on 04/28/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 05/05/2026 05:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
