USA v. Pavel Ruiz-Hernandez
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| PAVEL RAMON RUIZ-HERNANDEZ |
| 26-11517 |
| May 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Pavel Ramon Ruiz-Hernandez. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 06/10/2026 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 8 Appellant's PREMATURE brief filed by Pavel Ramon Ruiz-Hernandez. [Entered: 05/20/2026 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 7 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Pavel Ramon Ruiz-Hernandez. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 05/20/2026 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 6 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Pavel Ramon Ruiz-Hernandez was filed on 05/11/2026. Docket Entry 79. [Entered: 05/20/2026 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 5 AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney George Espy Doty, III for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11517] (ECF: George Doty) [Entered: 05/18/2026 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney George Espy Doty, III for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11517] (ECF: George Doty) [Entered: 05/13/2026 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Pavel Ramon Ruiz-Hernandez. [Entered: 05/11/2026 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by George E. Doty III for USA Related cases? No. [26-11517] (ECF: George Doty) [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Pavel Ramon Ruiz-Hernandez on 04/29/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 05/01/2026 04:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Pavel Ruiz-Hernandez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Florida |
| Represented By: | George Espy Doty III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PAVEL RAMON RUIZ-HERNANDEZ | |
| Represented By: | Pavel Ramon Ruiz-Hernandez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
