Francis Bestard-Matos v. U.S. Attorney General
| FRANCIS MARTIN BESTARD-MATOS |
| U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-11613 |
| May 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioner Francis Martin Bestard-Matos. [Entered: 06/11/2026 03:42 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER: Motion for extension to file agency record filed by Respondent U.S. Attorney General is GRANTED by clerk [ # 7 ]. [Entered: 06/11/2026 12:23 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for extension of time to file agency record to 08/14/2026 filed by U.S. Attorney General. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [7] [26-11613] (ECF: Carlton Sheffield) [Entered: 06/11/2026 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Francis Martin Bestard-Matos. You have failed to file the CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 06/01/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Carlton Frederick Sheffield for Respondent U.S. Attorney General. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11613] (ECF: Carlton Sheffield) [Entered: 05/28/2026 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of receipt: as to Petitioner Francis Martin Bestard-Matos.. [Entered: 05/28/2026 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Carlton F. Sheffield, OIL OIL for U.S. Attorney General. Related cases? No. [26-11613] (ECF: Carlton Sheffield) [Entered: 05/11/2026 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Francis Martin Bestard-Matos. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [Entered: 05/11/2026 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Petitioner Francis Martin Bestard-Matos. Additional Documents Needed: IJ Order, BIA Order, Notice to Appear. Fee Status: IFP Pending. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 05/11/2026 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Francis Bestard-Matos v. U.S. Attorney General | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FRANCIS MARTIN BESTARD-MATOS | |
| Represented By: | Francis Martin Bestard-Matos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Michelle M. Ressler |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Carlton Frederick Sheffield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
