Stacey Parks v. Karim Khoja
| STACEY PARKS |
| KARIM KHOJA |
| 26-11709 |
| May 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Stacey Parks. You have failed to file the CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 07/01/2026 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 7 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Stacey Parks was filed on 06/12/2026. Docket Entry 33. [Entered: 06/12/2026 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of service filed as to Attorney Jacqueline Perez for Appellee Karim Khoja. [26-11709]--[Edited 06/11/2026 by TJS] (ECF: Jacqueline Perez) [Entered: 06/10/2026 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jacqueline Perez for Appellee Karim Khoja. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-11709] (ECF: Jacqueline Perez) [Entered: 06/10/2026 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Stacey Parks. You have failed to file the CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 06/08/2026 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jacqueline Perez for Karim Khoja. Related cases? No. [26-11709] (ECF: Jacqueline Perez) [Entered: 06/03/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 Returned Mail was received for Party Stacey Parks. IN RE: May 18, 2026, CIVIL - Notice of Docketing [Entered: 06/02/2026 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Stacey Parks on 05/14/2026. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis DE 31 filed on 05/14/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 05/18/2026 09:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Stacey Parks v. Karim Khoja | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STACEY PARKS | |
| Represented By: | Stacey Parks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KARIM KHOJA | |
| Represented By: | Martin S. Awerbach |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline Perez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
