In re: Armando Arce, Sr.
Petitioner: In re: ARMANDO ARCE, SR.
Respondent: CLERK OF COURT, ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF FLORIDA, OKALOOSA COUNTY'S JUDICIAL CORRECTION SERVICES LLC and ANGELA GILBERT
Case Number: 26-11794
Filed: May 21, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2026 Filing 5 MOTION MOOT: Motion for writ of mandamus is MOOT [ # 1 ] due to clerk's order filed 06/10/2026. Motion filed by Petitioner Armando Arce, Sr.. [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:56 PM]
June 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Armando Arce, Sr. failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:54 PM]
May 22, 2026 Filing 3 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 2 ] filed by Petitioner Armando Arce, Sr.. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): You have failed to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1. [Entered: 05/22/2026 03:46 PM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Writ Respondent Clerk of Court, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [Entered: 05/22/2026 03:44 PM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner Armando Arce, Sr.. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 05/22/2026 03:36 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Armando Arce, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: ARMANDO ARCE, SR.
Represented By: Armando Arce Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CLERK OF COURT, ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: OKALOOSA COUNTY'S JUDICIAL CORRECTION SERVICES LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ANGELA GILBERT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?