Mack Wells, et al v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al
| MACK WELLS and MAURICE SYMONETTE |
| U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee for FASC 2005 AHL3, MERS RESIDENTIAL FUNDING, VALERIE MANNO SHURR, Judge, JOHN SCHLESINGER, Judge, DE LA O, Judge, VERONICA DIAZ, Judge, SAMANTHA COHEIN, Judge, VIVIANNE DEL RIO, Judge, BROWNWYN C. MILLER, Appellate Judge and KEVIN MICHAEL EMAS, Appellate Judge |
| SERVICE |
| 26-11797 |
| May 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 05/26/2026 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 2 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellants Maurice Symonette and Mack Wells was filed on 05/18/2026. Docket Entry 96. [Entered: 05/26/2026 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Maurice Symonette and Mack Wells on 05/18/2026. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis and Affidavit filed on 05/18/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 05/26/2026 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.