Mark Hatcher v. William Cardenas, et al
| MARK EUGENE HATCHER |
| WILLIAM DANIEL CARDENAS, Individual and official capacity, LISA HASKINS CARTER, Individual and official capacity, MARK R. AMBROSE, JR., Individual and official capacity, MICHAEL ECKHART, Individual and official capacity, LINDSEY TYGART, Individual and official capacity, ADRIAN SOUL, Individual and official capacity and STATE OF FLORIDA |
| 26-11811 |
| May 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Mark Eugene Hatcher has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 06/17/2026 02:41 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 2 ] filed by Appellant Mark Eugene Hatcher. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s):. The "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act applies to this appeal. [Entered: 06/09/2026 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mark Eugene Hatcher. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [2] [Entered: 06/09/2026 08:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mark Eugene Hatcher on 05/26/2026. Fee Status: Three Strikes. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 05/27/2026 03:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
