FSD Biosciences, Inc., et alIn re: FSD Biosciences, Inc., et al
| In re: FSD BIOSCIENCES, INC. and FSD PHARMA, INC. |
| GBB DRINK LAB, INC. and JOSEPH ROMANO |
| 26-12088 |
| June 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice that no action will be taken on Appendix filed by Attorney Jeffrey S. Beelaert for Petitioners FSD Biosciences, Inc. and FSD Pharma, Inc.. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): An Appearance of Counsel form has not been filed, See 11th Cir. R. 46-5. Additionally, you have failed to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1. [Entered: 06/17/2026 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Petitioners FSD Biosciences, Inc. and FSD Pharma, Inc.. [26-12088] (ECF: Jeffrey Beelaert) [Entered: 06/16/2026 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to request or set oral argument filed by Petitioners FSD Biosciences, Inc. and FSD Pharma, Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 06/16/2026 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioners FSD Biosciences, Inc. and FSD Pharma, Inc. [Entered: 06/16/2026 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioners FSD Biosciences, Inc. and FSD Pharma, Inc.. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 06/16/2026 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
