Taher Shriteh v. NYP Holdings, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: TAHER SHRITEH
Defendant: NYP HOLDINGS, INC. and JOSH CHRISTENSON
Case Number: 26-12223
Filed: June 26, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2026 Filing 12 Returned Mail was received for Attorney L. Elijah Stiers for Appellant Taher Shriteh. IN RE: 8/4/26 Clerk's Order of Dismissal [Entered: 08/21/2026 10:05 AM]
August 4, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Taher Shriteh failed to file a Civil Appeal Statement form and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/04/2026 10:14 AM]
July 24, 2026 Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Chelsea Teresa Kelly for Appellees Josh Christenson and NYP Holdings, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-12223] (ECF: Chelsea Kelly) [Entered: 07/24/2026 11:21 AM]
July 16, 2026 Filing 9 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Leena M. Charlton for Josh Christenson and NYP Holdings, Inc.. Related cases? No. [26-12223] (ECF: Leena Charlton) [Entered: 07/16/2026 05:15 PM]
July 15, 2026 Filing 8 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Taher Shriteh. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files in the District Court a completed Transcript Order Form OR a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered. [Entered: 07/15/2026 02:59 PM]
July 15, 2026 Filing 7 Joel Careaga for Appellant Taher Shriteh, Santiago A. Cueto for Appellant Taher Shriteh and L. Elijah Stiers for Appellant Taher Shriteh is notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files a Civil Appeal Statement. [Entered: 07/15/2026 02:53 PM]
July 15, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Joel Careaga for Taher Shriteh, Santiago A. Cueto for Taher Shriteh and L. Elijah Stiers for Taher Shriteh. You have failed to file the CIP and failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 07/15/2026 02:53 PM]
July 9, 2026 Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Benjamin Tyler for Josh Christenson and NYP Holdings, Inc.. Related cases? No. [26-12223] (ECF: Benjamin Tyler) [Entered: 07/09/2026 11:55 AM]
July 8, 2026 Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Scott Daniel Ponce for Josh Christenson and NYP Holdings, Inc.. Related cases? No. [26-12223] (ECF: Scott Ponce) [Entered: 07/08/2026 06:44 PM]
July 8, 2026 Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Chelsea Teresa Kelly for Josh Christenson and NYP Holdings, Inc.. Related cases? No. [26-12223] (ECF: Chelsea Kelly) [Entered: 07/08/2026 06:07 PM]
July 8, 2026 Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Laura Rose Handman for Josh Christenson and NYP Holdings, Inc.. Related cases? No. [26-12223] (ECF: Laura Handman) [Entered: 07/08/2026 06:04 PM]
June 26, 2026 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Taher Shriteh on 06/25/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 06/26/2026 01:57 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Taher Shriteh v. NYP Holdings, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TAHER SHRITEH
Represented By: L. Elijah Stiers
Represented By: Santiago A. Cueto
Represented By: Joel Careaga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NYP HOLDINGS, INC.
Represented By: Scott Daniel Ponce
Represented By: Chelsea Teresa Kelly
Represented By: Laura Rose Handman
Represented By: Leena M. Charlton
Represented By: Benjamin Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSH CHRISTENSON
Represented By: Scott Daniel Ponce
Represented By: Chelsea Teresa Kelly
Represented By: Laura Rose Handman
Represented By: Leena M. Charlton
Represented By: Benjamin Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?