China Lonon v. Warden, Hays SP
| CHINA LONON, a.k.a China Lonon El Bey |
| WARDEN, HAYS SP |
| 26-12303 |
| June 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant China Lonon was filed on 05/20/2026. Docket Entry 20. [Entered: 07/02/2026 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant China Lonon on 06/29/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/02/2026 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: China Lonon v. Warden, Hays SP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CHINA LONON, a.k.a China Lonon El Bey | |
| Represented By: | China Lonon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN, HAYS SP | |
| Represented By: | Clint Christopher Malcolm |
| Represented By: | Matthew Crowder |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Carr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
