Marissa Rodriguez v. Levon Allen, et al
| MARISSA RENEE RODRIGUEZ |
| LEVON ALLEN, MIKELL MAURICE WALKER, JR., ANWAR YURI FULLERTON, MAHKYA CURRY, HARVEY WILLIAM CLAIBORNE, JR., COURTLAND JAMES BROUSSARD and L BLAKE |
| SERVICE |
| 26-12306 |
| June 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Derek S. Rajavuori for Appellee Marissa Renee Rodriguez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-12306] (ECF: Derek Rajavuori) [Entered: 08/03/2026 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 07/31/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Michael D. Hoffer for Appellants Levon Allen, L Blake, Courtland James Broussard, Harvey William Claiborne, Jr., Mahkya Curry, Anwar Yuri Fullerton and Mikell Maurice Walker, Jr.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-12306] (ECF: Michael Hoffer) [Entered: 07/21/2026 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 7 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Michael D. Hoffer for Appellants Levon Allen, L Blake, Courtland James Broussard, Harvey William Claiborne, Jr., Mahkya Curry, Anwar Yuri Fullerton and Mikell Maurice Walker, Jr.. Related cases? No. [26-12306] (ECF: Michael Hoffer) [Entered: 07/21/2026 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Joseph A. Canter for Marissa Renee Rodriguez. Related cases? No. [26-12306] (ECF: Joseph Canter) [Entered: 07/15/2026 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 5 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Michael D. Hoffer for Appellants. Appellants' brief is due on 09/09/2026, with the appellants' appendix due within 7 days of the filing date of the appellants' brief. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 07/14/2026 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Derek S. Rajavuori for Marissa Renee Rodriguez. Related cases? No. [26-12306] (ECF: Derek Rajavuori) [Entered: 07/14/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael D. Hoffer for Levon Allen, L Blake, Courtland James Broussard, Harvey William Claiborne, Jr., Mahkya Curry, Anwar Yuri Fullerton and Mikell Maurice Walker, Jr.. Related cases? No. [26-12306] (ECF: Michael Hoffer) [Entered: 07/14/2026 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Levon Allen. The appellant's brief is due on or before 08/10/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 07/07/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Levon Allen, L Blake, Courtland James Broussard, Harvey William Claiborne, Jr., Mahkya Curry, Anwar Yuri Fullerton and Mikell Maurice Walker, Jr. on 06/29/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/07/2026 09:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.