Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
| WASEEM DAKER |
| COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AHMAD HOLT, Assistant Commissioner, ROBERT TOOLE, Former Facilities Director, GREGORY DOZIER, Former Commissioner, TIMOTHY WARD, Former Commissioner, STAN SHEPARD, Former Facilities Director, BENJAMIN FORD, Facilities Director, JENNIFER AMMONS, Legal Director, WILLIAM BURSE, Commissioner's Designee and JOHN AND JANE DOE, Commissioner's Designee |
| 26-12334 |
| July 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Party Waseem Daker. [Entered: 07/10/2026 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 07/08/2026 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Waseem Daker on 06/29/2026. Fee Status: Three Strikes. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/08/2026 04:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
