Shaun Stewart v. State of Florida, et al
| SHAUN PATRICK STEWART |
| STATE OF FLORIDA, individual and official capacity, ANDREW SIGLER, individual and official capacity as public defender, DANIEL SNOW, individual and official capacity as public defender, SARASOTA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER, individual and official capacity and ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER, individual and official capacity |
| 26-12360 |
| July 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Shaun Patrick Stewart. Motion is Unopposed [4] [26-12360] (ECF: Shaun Stewart) [Entered: 07/23/2026 12:13 AM] |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Party Mr. Shaun Patrick Stewart. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-12360] (ECF: Shaun Stewart) [Entered: 07/22/2026 11:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Mr. Shaun Patrick Stewart was filed on 07/10/2026. Docket Entry 50. [Entered: 07/13/2026 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Shaun Patrick Stewart on 07/06/2026. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed on 07/06/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/08/2026 02:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.