Shakeyra Bradley v. Emory Hillandale Hospital, et al
Plaintiff: SHAKEYRA K. BRADLEY
Defendant: EMORY HILLANDALE HOSPITAL and EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MIDTOWN
Case Number: 26-12424
Filed: July 10, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Shakeyra K. Bradley, pro se, filed a notice of appeal but did not sign it, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a). While this is not a jurisdictional defect, it is nevertheless one that must be corrected for the appeal to proceed. See Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 760 65 (2001). Accordingly, Bradley is DIRECTED to file a signed, substitute notice of appeal in the district court within 14 days. Failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See 11th Cir. R. 42 1(b). The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide a copy of this Order to the district court. The district court shall transmit to this Court any notice of appeal filed in compliance with this Order. NGA (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 09/04/2026 04:11 PM]
August 17, 2026 Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Shakeyra K. Bradley. [Entered: 08/26/2026 03:04 PM]
August 13, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Shakeyra K. Bradley. You have failed to file the CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 08/13/2026 02:45 PM]
August 13, 2026 Filing 2 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Shakeyra K. Bradley was filed on 08/12/2026. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 08/13/2026 02:42 PM]
August 11, 2026 Filing 3 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Shakeyra K. Bradley. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 08/13/2026 02:43 PM]
July 10, 2026 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Shakeyra K. Bradley on 07/09/2026. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: Motion for IFP filed on 07/09/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/14/2026 11:13 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Shakeyra Bradley v. Emory Hillandale Hospital, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHAKEYRA K. BRADLEY
Represented By: Shakeyra K. Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EMORY HILLANDALE HOSPITAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MIDTOWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?