Daniel Posey, III v. USA
Petitioner: DANIEL POSEY, III
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 26-12451
Filed: July 13, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2026 Filing 10 MOTION MOOT: Motion to proceed in forma pauperis is MOOT [ # 6 ]; Motion for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal is MOOT [ # 8 ] due to this Court's order filed 08/19/2026. Motion filed by Appellant Daniel Posey, III. [Entered: 08/19/2026 04:48 PM]
August 19, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: On its own motion, the Court dismisses appeal no. 26-12451 as duplicative of the appeal pending in no. 26-11716. Appeal no. 26-12451 is DISMISSED. BL, ALB and NGA (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 08/19/2026 04:43 PM]
August 4, 2026 Filing 8 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Daniel Posey, III. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8] [Entered: 08/04/2026 12:06 PM]
July 23, 2026 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Michael B. Billingsley for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-12451] (ECF: Michael Billingsley) [Entered: 07/23/2026 03:00 PM]
July 23, 2026 Filing 6 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Daniel Posey, III. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 07/23/2026 01:25 PM]
July 23, 2026 Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Daniel Posey, III. [Entered: 07/23/2026 01:24 PM]
July 15, 2026 Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Billingsley for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Alabama for USA. Related cases? No. [26-12451] (ECF: Michael Billingsley) [Entered: 07/15/2026 11:00 AM]
July 14, 2026 Filing 3 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Daniel Posey, III was filed on 06/10/2026. Docket Entry 46. [Entered: 07/14/2026 11:30 AM]
July 14, 2026 Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Daniel Posey, III was filed on 05/04/2026. Docket Entry 39. [Entered: 07/14/2026 11:29 AM]
July 13, 2026 Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Daniel Posey, III on 06/29/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/14/2026 11:24 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Posey, III v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DANIEL POSEY, III
Represented By: Daniel Posey III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Alabama
Represented By: Michael B. Billingsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?