Albert Chavez v. City of Tampa Water Department
| ALBERT CHAVEZ |
| CITY OF TAMPA WATER DEPARTMENT |
| 26-12467 |
| July 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Albert Chavez. The appellant's brief is due on or before 08/24/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 07/14/2026 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Albert Chavez on 07/13/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/14/2026 02:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Albert Chavez v. City of Tampa Water Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ALBERT CHAVEZ | |
| Represented By: | Belinda Noah |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY OF TAMPA WATER DEPARTMENT | |
| Represented By: | James Morgan Craig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.