Rene Ramirez-NeryIn re: Rene Ramirez-Nery
| In re: RENE RAMIREZ-NERY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-12527 |
| July 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive motion to vacate sentence filed by Petitioner Rene Ramirez-Nery. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/21/2026 10:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rene Ramirez-NeryIn re: Rene Ramirez-Nery | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: RENE RAMIREZ-NERY | |
| Represented By: | Rene Ramirez-Nery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Georgia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
