DeAndre Tolliver, Sr.In re: DeAndre Tolliver, Sr.
| In re: DEANDRE BRESHAWN TOLLIVER, SR. |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
| 26-12614 |
| July 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner DeAndre Breshawn Tolliver, Sr.. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/27/2026 04:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: DeAndre Tolliver, Sr.In re: DeAndre Tolliver, Sr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: DEANDRE BRESHAWN TOLLIVER, SR. | |
| Represented By: | DeAndre Breshawn Tolliver Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA | |
| Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.