Rasheed Ritter v. UHG I, LLC, et al
| RASHEED RITTER |
| UHG I, LLC and CREDIT CONTROL, LLC |
| 26-12634 |
| July 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Rasheed Ritter. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [12] [26-12634] (ECF: Rasheed Ritter) [Entered: 09/12/2026 07:50 AM] |
| Filing 11 Appellant's PREMATURE Appendix filed [Tab1Distrcit Court docket Sheet Tab2Opeartive Pleadings Tab3Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Reccomendation Tab4PLaintiff's Objections to report and Recommendation Tab5District Court Order on Report and Recommendation Tab6Final Judgement Tab7NoticeOfAp VOLUMES] by Appellant Rasheed Ritter. [26-12634]--[Edited 09/10/2026 by ASR] (ECF: Rasheed Ritter) [Entered: 09/10/2026 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 10 Appellant's PREMATURE brief filed by Rasheed Ritter. [26-12634]--[Edited 09/08/2026 by ASR] (ECF: Rasheed Ritter) [Entered: 09/05/2026 07:43 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Dale Golden for Credit Control, LLC and UHG I, LLC. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you remedy the default(s). If you are an appellee or respondent, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5(c), no action may be taken on your filings until you comply with the CIP rules. [Entered: 08/27/2026 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 8 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Rasheed Ritter was filed on 08/26/2026. Docket Entry 67. [Entered: 08/27/2026 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Dale T. Golden for UHG I, LLC. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-12634] (ECF: Dale Golden) [Entered: 08/26/2026 05:30 PM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Dale T. Golden for Credit Control, LLC. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-12634] (ECF: Dale Golden) [Entered: 08/26/2026 05:28 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Dale T. Golden for UHG I, LLC and Credit Control, LLC Related cases? No. [26-12634] (ECF: Dale Golden) [Entered: 08/26/2026 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Rasheed Ritter. [Entered: 08/18/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Party Rasheed Ritter. No hearings. [Entered: 08/14/2026 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 Returned Mail was received for Attorney Joseph Charles Proulx for Appellees Credit Control, LLC and UHG I, LLC. IN RE: Civil docketing notice. [Entered: 08/14/2026 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Rasheed Ritter on 07/27/2026. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed on 07/27/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/29/2026 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
