Jorge Valle-Ramos v. Michael Stanley, et al
| JORGE VALLE-RAMOS |
| MICHAEL STANLEY, DANIEL BRADY and CITY OF ORLANDO |
| 26-12655 |
| July 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Aaditya Tolappa for Appellant Jorge Valle-Ramos. Appellants brief due on 10/14/2026 as to Appellant Jorge Valle-Ramos. Appendix due on 10/21/2026 as to Appellant Jorge Valle-Ramos. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 09/09/2026 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Derek J. Angell for Appellees Daniel Brady, City of Orlando and Michael Stanley. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-12655] (ECF: Derek Angell) [Entered: 08/25/2026 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 11 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 08/19/2026 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 10 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Aaditya Tolappa for Appellant Jorge Valle-Ramos. Related cases? No. [26-12655] (ECF: Aaditya Tolappa) [Entered: 08/17/2026 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-12655] (ECF: Aaditya Tolappa) [Entered: 08/17/2026 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Derek J. Angell for Daniel Brady and Michael Stanley. Related cases? No. [26-12655] (ECF: Derek Angell) [Entered: 08/12/2026 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Aaditya Tolappa for Jorge Valle-Ramos. Related cases? No. [26-12655] (ECF: Aaditya Tolappa) [Entered: 08/10/2026 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Jorge Valle-Ramos. The appellant's brief is due on or before 09/16/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 08/07/2026 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Suzanne L. Trimble, Filer: Jorge Valle-Ramos, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 08/07/2026, Proceeding Type and Date: Pre-Trial Proceedings 02/09/2026. [Entered: 08/07/2026 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Suzanne L. Trimble, 08/06/2026, Jorge Valle-Ramos, Pre-Trial Proceedings 02/09/2026. [Entered: 08/06/2026 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Jorge Valle-Ramos, Court Reporter: Suzanne L. Trimble, Proceeding Type and Date: Pre-Trial Proceedings 02/09/2026. [Entered: 08/06/2026 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Court Reporter Acknowledgment submitted by. [26-12655] (ECF: Suzanne Trimble) [Entered: 08/06/2026 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jorge Valle-Ramos on 07/28/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/30/2026 02:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
