Michael Dyer v. Washington SP Warden
Petitioner: MICHAEL DAVID DYER
Respondent: WASHINGTON SP WARDEN
Case Number: 26-12679
Filed: July 30, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2026 Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Michael David Dyer was filed on 06/10/2026. Docket Entry 16. [Entered: 07/31/2026 02:11 PM]
July 30, 2026 Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael David Dyer on 07/23/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 07/31/2026 02:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Dyer v. Washington SP Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MICHAEL DAVID DYER
Represented By: Michael David Dyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WASHINGTON SP WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?