Kevin Lee v. Hays SP Warden
| KEVIN MARIO LEE |
| HAYS SP WARDEN |
| 26-12727 |
| August 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Kevin Mario Lee was filed on 07/31/2026. Docket Entry 5. [Entered: 08/05/2026 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Kevin Mario Lee on 07/31/2026 USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed on 07/31/2026. DE# 8. Fee Status: IFP Granted. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 08/05/2026 12:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kevin Lee v. Hays SP Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: KEVIN MARIO LEE | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Mario Lee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: HAYS SP WARDEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
