Scott Rued, et al v. Scott Harris, et al
| SCOTT DARYLL RUED, LEAH JEAN RUED and JOSEPH DARYLL RUED |
| SCOTT S. HARRIS, PIPA FISHER, JOHN ROBERTS, CLARENCE THOMAS, SAMUEL ALITO, SONYA SOTOMAYOR, ELENA KEGAN, NEIL M. GORSUCH, BRETT M. KAVANAUGH and AMY CONEY BARRETT |
| SERVICE |
| 26-12782 |
| August 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for injunction pending appeal filed by Appellants Joseph Daryll Rued, Leah Jean Rued and Scott Daryll Rued. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [4] [Entered: 08/13/2026 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Scott Daryll Rued. The appellant's brief is due on or before 09/16/2026. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 08/10/2026 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO PARTIES: Due to the large number of parties associated with this appeal, not all parties from the district court docket have been entered on this Court's docket at this time. The parties may consult the relevant notice(s) of appeal, other case documents, and the district court docket to identify all parties. If any party objects to not having all parties listed on the docket, the party may file an objection stating its reasoning within 14 days after the date of this notice. [Entered: 08/10/2026 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Joseph Daryll Rued, Leah Jean Rued and Scott Daryll Rued on 08/07/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 08/10/2026 11:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.