Timothy Lafferty v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
| TIMOTHY LAFFERTY |
| COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE |
| 26-13095 |
| September 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Appellant Timothy Lafferty. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 09/02/2026 02:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Timothy Lafferty v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: TIMOTHY LAFFERTY | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Lafferty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE | |
| Represented By: | Francesca Ugolini |
| Represented By: | U.S. Tax Appellate DOJ - Service |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Kies |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
