In re: Steven Aubrey
Petitioner: In re: STEVEN B. AUBREY
Respondent: CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS and BRIAN D. FILLINGIM
Unknown: SERVICE
Case Number: 26-13135
Filed: September 3, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2026 Filing 7 TIME SENSITIVE MOTION For the Court to GRANT this Motion for Leave to file a Corrected Petition for Writ of Mandamus, direct the Clerk to file the attached Corrected Petition (Exhibit A), and substitute it as the operative petition in this proceeding. filed by Steven B. Aubrey. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [7] [26-13135] (ECF: Steven Aubrey) [Entered: 09/07/2026 09:06 PM]
September 4, 2026 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Geoffrey Marks for respondents Brian Fillingim and City of Dallas, Texas. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [26-13135] (ECF: Geoffrey Marks) [Entered: 09/04/2026 10:13 AM]
September 4, 2026 Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Geoffrey Marks for respondents Brian Fillingim and City of Dallas, Texas Related cases? No. [26-13135] (ECF: Geoffrey Marks) [Entered: 09/04/2026 10:08 AM]
September 3, 2026 Filing 5 Notice of receipt: Mandamus Appendix / Exhibits as to Petitioner Steven B. Aubrey.. [Entered: 09/04/2026 05:11 PM]
September 3, 2026 Filing 2 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioner Steven B. Aubrey. [Entered: 09/03/2026 04:58 PM]
September 3, 2026 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner Steven B. Aubrey. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 09/03/2026 04:56 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Steven Aubrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: STEVEN B. AUBREY
Represented By: Steven B. Aubrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS
Represented By: Tamatha Suzanne Alvarez
Represented By: Geoffrey B. Marks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BRIAN D. FILLINGIM
Represented By: Tamatha Suzanne Alvarez
Represented By: Geoffrey B. Marks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Unknown: SERVICE
Represented By: Ben L. Stool
Represented By: Michael R. Piper
Represented By: Barbara S. Nicholas
Represented By: Cherie K. Batsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?