Catherine Mead v. Life Insurance Company of North America
| CATHERINE MEAD |
| LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA |
| 26-13270 |
| September 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Employee Retirement (ERISA) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Catherine Mead on 09/14/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 09/16/2026 11:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Catherine Mead v. Life Insurance Company of North America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CATHERINE MEAD | |
| Represented By: | Gregory D. Swartwood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Ruel W. Smith |
| Represented By: | Molly Litchfield |
| Represented By: | Steven Douglas Lehner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.