Menndek Cushe v. Wintrust Mortgage
| MENNDEK CUSHE |
| WINTRUST MORTGAGE, a Division of Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A. |
| 26-13288 |
| September 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Menndek Cushe on 09/10/2026. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis DE 43 filed on 09/10/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 09/16/2026 11:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Menndek Cushe v. Wintrust Mortgage | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MENNDEK CUSHE | |
| Represented By: | Menndek Cushe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WINTRUST MORTGAGE, a Division of Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Alec P. Hayes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
