Malik Warthen v. Clay County DF Warden
| MALIK LEVANIA WARTHEN |
| CLAY COUNTY DF WARDEN |
| 26-13293 |
| September 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Malik Levania Warthen was filed on 09/17/2026. Docket Entry 28. [Entered: 09/18/2026 08:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Malik Levania Warthen on 09/15/2026 USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed on 09/15/2026. DE# 26. Fee Status: IFP Pending. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 09/17/2026 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Malik Warthen v. Clay County DF Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MALIK LEVANIA WARTHEN | |
| Represented By: | Malik Levania Warthen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CLAY COUNTY DF WARDEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
