Jonathan Hall v. Warden Valdosta State Prison
| JONATHAN HALL |
| WARDEN VALDOSTA STATE PRISON |
| 26-13296 |
| September 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jonathan Hall on 09/11/2026 USDC motion pending: MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed on 09/11/2026. DE# 20. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 09/16/2026 03:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jonathan Hall v. Warden Valdosta State Prison | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JONATHAN HALL | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Hall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN VALDOSTA STATE PRISON | |
| Represented By: | Michael Oldham |
| Represented By: | Meghan Hobbs Hill |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Carr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.