Jonathan Lewis v. M. Casey
| JONATHAN KYLE LEWIS |
| M. CASEY, individual capacity |
| 26-13312 |
| September 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jonathan Kyle Lewis on 09/14/2026. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed on 09/14/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 09/17/2026 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jonathan Lewis v. M. Casey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JONATHAN KYLE LEWIS | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Kyle Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: M. CASEY, individual capacity | |
| Represented By: | Lydon William Schultz |
| Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
