Broadtree Reserve at Gwinnett, LLC v. Christopher Thomas
| BROADTREE RESERVE AT GWINNETT, LLC, d.b.a. Reserve at Gwinnett |
| CHRISTOPHER THOMAS |
| 26-13437 |
| September 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Rent, Lease, Ejectment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Christopher Thomas on 09/22/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 09/25/2026 08:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Broadtree Reserve at Gwinnett, LLC v. Christopher Thomas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BROADTREE RESERVE AT GWINNETT, LLC, d.b.a. Reserve at Gwinnett | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Loraine Edwards Colston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CHRISTOPHER THOMAS | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
