Steven Smith v. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
| STEVEN SMITH |
| AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY, GEORGIA |
| 26-13460 |
| September 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia on 09/24/2026. Fee Status: Fee Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 09/28/2026 04:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Steven Smith v. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STEVEN SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Charles C. Stebbins |
| Represented By: | James S. Murray |
| Represented By: | Robert Perry Mangum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY, GEORGIA | |
| Represented By: | Tameka Haynes |
| Represented By: | Randolph Frails |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.