Thomas Bailey v. Baldwin County Sheriff
| THOMAS BAILEY |
| BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF |
| 26-13604 |
| October 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Thomas Bailey was filed on 09/04/2026. Docket Entry 38. [Entered: 10/06/2026 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Thomas Bailey on 10/05/2026. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 10/06/2026 03:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thomas Bailey v. Baldwin County Sheriff | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: THOMAS BAILEY | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Bailey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF | |
| Represented By: | Steven Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.