Catherine Price v. Amtrust Financial Services, Inc.
| CATHERINE PRICE |
| AMTRUST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. |
| 26-13819 |
| October 19, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Catherine Price on 10/16/2026. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Appeal In Forma Pauperis de#67 filed on 10/15/2026. See attached docketing notice for important information, including deadlines. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Catherine Price v. Amtrust Financial Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CATHERINE PRICE | |
| Represented By: | Catherine Price |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AMTRUST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | John David Osgathorpe |
| Represented By: | Job William Fickett |
| Represented By: | Michael N. Chesney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
