Covington v. New York City Police Departmen
| Ronnie Covington |
| New York City Police Department, City of New York, Lee P. Brown, Commissioner, New York City Police Department, Raymond Kelly, First Deputy Commissioner, New York City Police Department, Robert Johnston, Chief, New York City Police Department, Tour Commander, 108 PCT., New York City Police Department, Desk Lieutenant 108 PCT., New York City Police Department, Serg. Supervisor " C-Doe, 108 PCT., New York City Police Department, Police Officer Jacqu Guillois, 108 PCT., New York City Police Department, Police Officer "D-Doe", 108 PCT., New YorkCity Police Department, "Four other Police Officers", 108 PCT., New York City Police Department, County of Queens, New York, District Attorney Jo J. Santucci, Queens County, "K-Doe", Ass't. District Attorney, Queens County, Ernest Gallo, President, E & J Gallo Winery, E&J Winery, Joseph E. Gallo, President, Gallo Sales Co., Gallo Sales Co., Merrill Lynch and Company, William A. Schreyer, Chairman, Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc.,, Daniel P. Tully, President, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.,, Merrill Lynch Capital Partners, "L-Doe", President, Merrill Lynch Capital Partners, Borg-Warner Corporation, James Bere, CEO, Borg-Warner Corp.,, Donald C. Trauscht, Vice-President of finance & strategy, Baker Industries, "G-Doe", President, Baker Industries, Baker Protective ser, "H-Doe", President, Baker Protective Services, Wells Fargo Guard se, "I-Doe", President, Wells Fargo Guard Services, "J-Doe", Security Supervisor, John Thomas, Security Officer, Wells Fargo Guard Services, E&J Gallo Wine Distr, Mark Taub, President, E&J Gallo Wine Distributors and Mel Halperin |
| 10-5116 |
| December 17, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Civil Rights |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
