Lavin v. Briefly Stated Inc. Profit Sha
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: John E. Lavin
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Briefly Stated Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Briefly Stated, Inc.
Case Number: 11-1750
Filed: May 2, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: LABOR LAWS-Retirement Act 1974
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lavin v. Briefly Stated Inc. Profit Sha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant-cross-appellee: John E. Lavin
Represented By: Peter DeChiara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee-cross-appellant: Briefly Stated Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Represented By: John Joseph Hay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee-cross-appellant: Briefly Stated, Inc.
Represented By: John Joseph Hay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?