Konrad v. Epley
Evelyn Konrad |
Mark Epley, Individually and in his capacity as Mayor of the Village of Southampton, Paul Robinson, Individually and as former Trustee of the Village of Southampton, Elbert W. Robinson, Jr., Individually, and in his capacity as Assistant Attorney for the Village of Southampton, Denis Guerin, owner of a property in the Rosko Place subdivision, in the Southampton Village, Melinda Quintin, owners of a property in the Rosko Place subdivision in the Village of Southampton and William Brown, resident of the Rosko Place subdivision in the Southampton VIllage |
13-4885 |
December 27, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Konrad v. Epley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: Evelyn Konrad | |
Represented By: | Evelyn Konrad |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: Mark Epley, Individually and in his capacity as Mayor of the Village of Southampton | |
Represented By: | David H. Arntsen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: Paul Robinson, Individually and as former Trustee of the Village of Southampton | |
Represented By: | David H. Arntsen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: Elbert W. Robinson, Jr., Individually, and in his capacity as Assistant Attorney for the Village of Southampton | |
Represented By: | David H. Arntsen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: Denis Guerin, owner of a property in the Rosko Place subdivision, in the Southampton Village | |
Represented By: | Declan P. Redfern |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: Melinda Quintin, owners of a property in the Rosko Place subdivision in the Village of Southampton | |
Represented By: | Daniel Charles Malone |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: William Brown, resident of the Rosko Place subdivision in the Southampton VIllage | |
Represented By: | William Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.