Martinez De Artiga v. Sessions
Petitioner: Patricia Xiomara Martinez De Artiga and Noe Antonio Artiga Martinez
Respondent: Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Case Number: 17-2898
Filed: September 19, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 10, 2020 Summary Martinez De Artiga v. Barr

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Martinez De Artiga v. Sessions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Patricia Xiomara Martinez De Artiga
Represented By: Rebecca Ruth Press
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Noe Antonio Artiga Martinez
Represented By: Rebecca Ruth Press
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Represented By: Lisa Marie Arnold
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?