Kimelman v. United States of America
United States of America |
Michael Kimelman |
17-347 |
February 2, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 05/17/2017, determining the appeal to SDNY, ISSUED.[Mandate][2075546] [17-347] [Entered: 07/11/2017 11:31 AM] |
Filing 51 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for certificate of appealability [ # 27 ] filed by Appellant Michael Kimelman, and dismissing the appeal, by RR, SLC, L.A. KAPLAN, FILED. [2037398][51] [17-347] [Entered: 05/17/2017 12:37 PM] |
Filing 50 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yana Segal, ASSIGNED.[2037390] [17-347] [Entered: 05/17/2017 12:31 PM] |
Filing 43 LETTER, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman apprising the court of an error in citation, RECEIVED. Service date 05/13/2017 by CM/ECF.[2034689] [17-347]--[Edited 05/15/2017 by HT] [Entered: 05/13/2017 10:13 AM] |
Filing 40 ARGUMENT NOTICE, to attorneys/parties, TRANSMITTED.[2025722] [17-347] [Entered: 05/03/2017 01:30 PM] |
Filing 28 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION, for certificate of appealability [ # 26 ], [ # 27 ], on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED.[1982980] [17-347] [Entered: 03/06/2017 03:46 PM] |
Filing 27 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED. Service date 03/06/2017 by CM/ECF. [1982957] [17-347] [Entered: 03/06/2017 03:28 PM] |
Filing 26 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, for certificate of appealability, [25], on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED.[1982165] [17-347] [Entered: 03/06/2017 08:39 AM] |
Filing 25 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED. Service date 03/03/2017 by CM/ECF. [1982118] [17-347] [Entered: 03/03/2017 08:33 PM] |
Filing 24 ORDER, dated 03/03/2017, dismissing appeal by 03/16/2017, unless Appellant Michael Kimelman, moves for certificate of appealability, FILED.[1981154] [17-347] [Entered: 03/03/2017 08:52 AM] |
Filing 23 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, district court receipt # 465401174861, FILED.[1972675] [17-347] [Entered: 02/21/2017 11:00 AM] |
Filing 22 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM B, [ # 19 ], [ # 20 ], [ # 21 ], on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED.[1972357] [17-347] [Entered: 02/21/2017 08:43 AM] |
Filing 21 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED. Service date 02/17/2017 by CM/ECF, hand delivery.[1972042] [17-347] [Entered: 02/17/2017 03:12 PM] |
Filing 20 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED. Service date 02/17/2017 by CM/ECF, hand delivery.[1972041] [17-347] [Entered: 02/17/2017 03:11 PM] |
Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FORM B, [18], on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED.[1971424] [17-347] [Entered: 02/17/2017 09:10 AM] |
Filing 18 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman , FILED. Service date 02/16/2017 by CM/ECF.[1971213] [17-347] [Entered: 02/16/2017 04:28 PM] |
Filing 17 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, [ # 14 ], [ # 15 ], on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED.[1963483] [17-347] [Entered: 02/07/2017 10:52 AM] |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY, Brian Roger Blais for Appellee United States of America, in case 17-347, [ # 15 ], ADDED.[1963478] [17-347] [Entered: 02/07/2017 10:52 AM] |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 02/07/2017 by CM/ECF. [1963338] [17-347] [Entered: 02/07/2017 09:49 AM] |
Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, [11], on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED.[1963302] [17-347] [Entered: 02/07/2017 09:32 AM] |
Filing 13 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, [ # 9 ], [ # 10 ], on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED.[1963298] [17-347] [Entered: 02/07/2017 09:30 AM] |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Emily Burgess for Appellant Michael Kimelman, in case 17-347, [ # 10 ], ADDED.[1963297] [17-347] [Entered: 02/07/2017 09:30 AM] |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 02/06/2017 by CM/ECF. [1962832] [17-347] [Entered: 02/06/2017 02:27 PM] |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED. Service date 02/06/2017 by CM/ECF. [1962780] [17-347] [Entered: 02/06/2017 01:56 PM] |
Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, [7], on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED.[1962753] [17-347] [Entered: 02/06/2017 01:35 PM] |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Noam Biale for Appellant Michael Kimelman, in case 17-347, [ # 6 ], ADDED.[1962751] [17-347] [Entered: 02/06/2017 01:35 PM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED. Service date 02/06/2017 by CM/ECF. [1962695] [17-347] [Entered: 02/06/2017 12:36 PM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED. Service date 02/06/2017 by CM/ECF. [1962659] [17-347] [Entered: 02/06/2017 12:20 PM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX (CRIMINAL), in lieu of record, FILED.[1962601] [17-347] [Entered: 02/06/2017 11:46 AM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX (CIVIL), in lieu of record, FILED.[1962596] [17-347]--[Edited 02/06/2017 by HT] [Entered: 02/06/2017 11:43 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION, dated 01/17/2017, RECEIVED.[1962593] [17-347] [Entered: 02/06/2017 11:43 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Michael Kimelman, FILED. [1962588] [17-347] [Entered: 02/06/2017 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.