World Wide Technology Holding v. World Wide Work Tech LLC
| World Wide Work Tech LLC, a New York limited liability company |
| World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc., a Missouri corporation and World Wide Technology, Inc., a Missouri corporation |
| Najeeb Khan, an individual |
| 18-1284 |
| April 30, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 05/25/2018, determining the appeal to NDNY, copy to pro se Appellant, ISSUED.[Mandate][2346770] [18-1284] [Entered: 07/17/2018 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 19 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yenni Liu, ASSIGNED.[2332980] [18-1284] [Entered: 06/26/2018 04:23 PM] |
Filing 18
ORDER, [ # 5 ] appeal dismissed for Appellant Najeeb Khan's failure to pay fee, EFFECTIVE.[2332977] [18-1284] [Entered: 06/26/2018 04:22 PM]
|
| Filing 15 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL [ # 13 ], on behalf of Appellee World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc. and World Wide Technology, Inc., FILED.[2320317] [18-1284] [Entered: 06/07/2018 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Barbara Smith for World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc. World Wide Technology, Inc., in case 18-1284 , [ # 13 ], ADDED.[2320306] [18-1284] [Entered: 06/07/2018 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc. and World Wide Technology, Inc., FILED. Service date 06/07/2018 by CM/ECF. [2320178] [18-1284] [Entered: 06/07/2018 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, [11], on behalf of Appellee World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc. and World Wide Technology, Inc., FILED.[2316349] [18-1284] [Entered: 06/01/2018 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee World Wide Technology, Inc. and World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc., FILED. Service date 05/30/2018 by CM/ECF. [2313427] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/30/2018 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Chris LaRocco, [ # 9 ], in place of attorney Jacquelyn Schell, SUBSTITUTED.[2312058] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/25/2018 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc. and World Wide Technology, Inc., FILED. Service date 05/25/2018 by CM/ECF. [2312047] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/25/2018 02:52 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER, dated 05/25/2018, dismissing appeal by 06/15/2018, unless Appellant Najeeb Khan, submits the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se, FILED.[2311728] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/25/2018 11:38 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER, dated 05/25/2018, dismissing appeal by 06/15/2018, unless Appellant Najeeb Khan, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se, FILED.[2311711] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/25/2018 11:33 AM]
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE, to Appellee World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc. and World Wide Technology, Inc. , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2311703] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/25/2018 11:29 AM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER, dated 05/25/2018, dismissing appeal by 06/15/2018, unless Appellant Najeeb Khan, submits the fee or moves for in forma pauperis, copy to pro se, FILED.[2311695] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/25/2018 11:26 AM]
|
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2294111] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/03/2018 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2292678] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/01/2018 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/22/2018, RECEIVED.[2292675] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/01/2018 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Najeeb Khan, FILED. [2292664] [18-1284] [Entered: 05/01/2018 04:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: World Wide Technology Holding v. World Wide Work Tech LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc., a Missouri corporation | |
| Represented By: | Chris LaRocco Esq. |
| Represented By: | Barbara Smith Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: World Wide Technology, Inc., a Missouri corporation | |
| Represented By: | Chris LaRocco Esq. |
| Represented By: | Barbara Smith Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: World Wide Work Tech LLC, a New York limited liability company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Najeeb Khan, an individual | |
| Represented By: | Najeeb Khan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
