Rigaud v. New York Police Department
Sergeant Phillip Conners, Jane Does and John Does 1 & 2 |
Sergeant Jose Camacho, Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly, Captain Timothy Dheedene, Deputy Inspector Charles McEvoy, Lieutenant Christopher F. Garcia, Police Officer Donald Kipp, Lieutenant Jason Margolis, Theresa Callahan, City of New York, New York Police Department and Sergeant Michael Zanelone |
Clifford Rigaud |
18-1289 |
April 30, 2018 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 05/21/2019, determining the appeal to EDNY, ISSUED.[Mandate][2592096] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/21/2019 12:21 PM] |
Filing 74 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for reconsideration [ # 70 ] filed by Appellant Clifford Rigaud, by DAL, SLC, E. RAMOS, FILED. [2587261][74] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/14/2019 01:22 PM] |
Filing 71 CURED DEFECTIVE motion for reconsideration [ # 70 ], [ # 69 ], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2585056] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/12/2019 09:28 AM] |
Filing 70 MOTION, to reconsider, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 06/11/2019 by CM/ECF. [2584944] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/11/2019 10:41 PM] |
Filing 69 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion for reconsideration, [68], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2583485] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/10/2019 01:55 PM] |
Filing 68 MOTION, to reconsider, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 06/07/2019 by CM/ECF. [2582903] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/07/2019 05:21 PM] |
Filing 67 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to reconsider, [66], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2580013] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/05/2019 07:35 AM] |
Filing 66 MOTION, to reconsider, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 06/04/2019 by CM/ECF. [2580000] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/04/2019 08:35 PM] |
Filing 65 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ralph Obas, ASSIGNED.[2569390] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/21/2019 03:40 PM] |
Filing 63 APPEAL, pursuant to court order, dated 05/21/2019, DISMISSED.[2569387] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/21/2019 03:39 PM] |
Filing 62 MOTION ORDER, denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the appeal is dismissed [ # 49 ] filed by Appellant Clifford Rigaud, by DAL, SLC, E. Ramos, FILED. [2569376][62] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/21/2019 03:37 PM] |
Filing 60 SUBMITTED NOTICE, to attorneys/parties, TRANSMITTED.[2551038] [18-1289] [Entered: 04/29/2019 05:55 PM] |
Filing 49 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 01/25/2019 by CM/ECF. [2482906] [18-1289] [Entered: 01/25/2019 07:35 PM] |
Filing 48 ORDER, dated 01/11/2019, dismissing appeal by 01/25/2019, unless Appellant Clifford Rigaud, submits the fee or moves for in forma pauperis, copy to pro se, FILED.[2473340] [18-1289] [Entered: 01/11/2019 12:54 PM] |
Filing 46 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Clifford Rigaud Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [41] from the docket, FILED.[2468130] [18-1289] [Entered: 01/04/2019 04:37 PM] |
Filing 42 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, [41], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2433075] [18-1289] [Entered: 11/14/2018 10:17 AM] |
Filing 41 CORRECTED , on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 11/13/2018 by CM/ECF, email.[2432825] [18-1289] [Entered: 11/13/2018 10:28 PM] |
Filing 40 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, [29], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2428914] [18-1289] [Entered: 11/08/2018 08:49 AM] |
Filing 30 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee New York Police Department, City of New York, Jason Margolis, Charles McEvoy, Donald Kipp, Timothy Dheedene, Christopher F. Garcia, Michael Zanelone, Theresa Callahan, Raymond W. Kelly and Jose Camacho, informing the Court that Attorney Noah Leibowitz and Attorney Jeffrey E. Baldwin will no longer be representing defendant-appellees, RECEIVED. Service date 08/09/2018 by CM/ECF.[2363966] [18-1289]--[Edited 08/10/2018 by ST] [Entered: 08/09/2018 11:58 AM] |
Filing 29 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 08/02/2018 by CM/ECF. [2357575] [18-1289] [Entered: 08/02/2018 04:27 AM] |
Filing 28 ORDER, dated 07/19/2018, dismissing appeal by 08/02/2018, unless Appellant Clifford Rigaud, submits the fee or moves for in forma pauperis, FILED.[2348434] [18-1289] [Entered: 07/19/2018 11:14 AM] |
Filing 27 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 06/21/2018, denying IFP, RECEIVED.[2331985] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/25/2018 03:32 PM] |
Filing 26 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM C [ # 25 ], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2318891] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/06/2018 11:26 AM] |
Filing 25 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 06/05/2018 by CM/ECF.[2318139] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/05/2018 02:18 PM] |
Filing 24 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM D [ # 22 ], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2316684] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/04/2018 09:50 AM] |
Filing 23 CURED DEFECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE [ # 21 ], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2316674] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/04/2018 09:46 AM] |
Filing 22 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 06/04/2018 by CM/ECF.[2316577] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/04/2018 09:01 AM] |
Filing 21 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 06/04/2018 by CM/ECF.[2316567] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/04/2018 08:56 AM] |
Filing 20 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D, [18], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2316423] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/01/2018 04:58 PM] |
Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [17], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2316410] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/01/2018 04:51 PM] |
Filing 18 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 06/01/2018 by CM/ECF.[2315580] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/01/2018 10:21 AM] |
Filing 17 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 06/01/2018 by CM/ECF.[2315569] [18-1289] [Entered: 06/01/2018 10:16 AM] |
Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [14], on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED.[2314967] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/31/2018 02:29 PM] |
Filing 15 LETTER, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, notifying the Court that Appellant's IFP motion is still pending in the district court, RECEIVED. Service date 05/29/2018 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2313179] [18-1289]--[Edited 05/31/2018 by ST] [Entered: 05/29/2018 08:16 PM] |
Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. Service date 05/29/2018 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2313177] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/29/2018 08:10 PM] |
Filing 13 ORDER, dated 05/16/2018, dismissing appeal by 05/30/2018, unless Appellant Clifford Rigaud, submits the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, FILED.[2303826] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/16/2018 09:07 AM] |
Filing 12 ORDER, dated 05/16/2018, dismissing appeal by 05/30/2018, unless Appellant Clifford Rigaud, submits Form C and D, FILED.[2303814] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/16/2018 08:56 AM] |
Filing 11 ORDER, dated 05/16/2018, dismissing appeal by 05/30/2018, unless Appellant Clifford Rigaud, submits the fee or moves for in forma pauperis, FILED.[2303798] [18-1289]--[Edited 05/16/2018 by ST] [Entered: 05/16/2018 08:47 AM] |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Jeffrey Edward Baldwin for Raymond W. Kelly City of New York Theresa Callahan Jose Camacho Donald Kipp Jason Margolis Timothy Dheedene Charles McEvoy New York Police Department Michael Zanelone Christopher F. Garcia, in case 18-1289 , [ # 9 ], ADDED.[2303789] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/16/2018 08:43 AM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee New York Police Department, City of New York, Raymond W. Kelly, Jason Margolis, Charles McEvoy, Donald Kipp, Timothy Dheedene, Christopher F. Garcia, Michael Zanelone, Theresa Callahan and Jose Camacho, FILED. Service date 05/15/2018 by CM/ECF. [2303434] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/15/2018 03:25 PM] |
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee New York Police Department, City of New York, Raymond W. Kelly, Jason Margolis, Charles McEvoy, Donald Kipp, Timothy Dheedene, Christopher F. Garcia, Michael Zanelone, Theresa Callahan and Jose Camacho, FILED. Service date 05/15/2018 by CM/ECF.[2303398] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/15/2018 03:12 PM] |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Theresa Callahan, City of New York, Timothy Dheedene, Christopher F. Garcia, Donald Kipp, Jason Margolis, Charles McEvoy, New York Police Department and Michael Zanelone, FILED. Service date 05/15/2018 by CM/ECF.[2303179] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/15/2018 12:53 PM] |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Susan Paulson, [ # 5 ], in place of attorney Zachary W. Carter, SUBSTITUTED.[2301725] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/14/2018 08:47 AM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Theresa Callahan, Jose Camacho, City of New York, Timothy Dheedene, Christopher F. Garcia, Raymond W. Kelly, Donald Kipp, Jason Margolis, Charles McEvoy, New York Police Department and Michael Zanelone, FILED. Service date 05/11/2018 by CM/ECF. [2301616] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/11/2018 05:04 PM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2293239] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/02/2018 11:41 AM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/30/2018, RECEIVED.[2293237] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/02/2018 11:41 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, dated 03/30/2018, RECEIVED.[2293223] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/02/2018 11:34 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Clifford Rigaud, FILED. [2293196] [18-1289] [Entered: 05/02/2018 11:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.