United States of America v. Francis (Carrol)
| Anthony Jackson, AKA Razor, AKA Worm, Raymond Gilkes, Fresh, Ryan Hines, AKA Mooch, Devaughn Blakey, AKA Natron, Trizzy, Jack Benjamin, Jerry Augustine, Juice, Kendall Miller, AKA Swin, Krishna Raghubar, Kareem Parnell, Goofy, Chris Mabry, Troy Wilcox, David Tucker, Prince, Rakeem Jones, Jason Ortega, AKA Fetty, Andre Francis, AKA Huddy, AKA Hut, Jose Acevedo, AKA Cake, Eric Landrine, AKA E. Waterz and David Thomas |
| United States of America |
| Chanju Carrol, AKA Choo |
| 19-1445 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 07/01/2019, on behalf of Appellant Chanju Carrol, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 07/01/2019 by CM/ECF.[2598724] [19-1445] [Entered: 07/01/2019 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 24 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 06/18/2019, on behalf of Appellant Chanju Carrol, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 06/18/2019 by CM/ECF.[2589678] [19-1445] [Entered: 06/18/2019 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 06/11/2019 by CM/ECF.[2584889] [19-1445] [Entered: 06/11/2019 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE, to Appellee United States of America , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2580744] [19-1445] [Entered: 06/05/2019 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 19 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT: [ # 17 ], ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, [ # 18 ], on behalf of Appellant Chanju Carrol, FILED.[2580738] [19-1445] [Entered: 06/05/2019 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Chanju Carrol, FILED. Service date 06/05/2019 by CM/ECF.[2580668] [19-1445] [Entered: 06/05/2019 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, [16], on behalf of Appellant Chanju Carrol, FILED.[2580295] [19-1445] [Entered: 06/05/2019 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Chanju Carrol, FILED. Service date 06/04/2019 by CM/ECF. [2579992] [19-1445] [Entered: 06/04/2019 06:16 PM] |
| Filing 14 CJA COUNSEL, Andrew St. Laurent, for Chanju Carrol, ASSIGNED.[2574341] [19-1445] [Entered: 05/29/2019 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION ORDER, granting motion for appointment of CJA counsel [ # 10 ] filed by Appellant Chanju Carrol; granting motion to be relieved as attorney [ # 10 ] filed by Appellant Chanju Carrol, FILED. [2574335][13] [19-1445] [Entered: 05/29/2019 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION, for appointment of CJA counsel, to be relieved as attorney, on behalf of Appellant Chanju Carrol, FILED. Service date 05/28/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2573722] [19-1445] [Entered: 05/28/2019 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 NEW CASE MANAGER, Gerard Whidbee, ASSIGNED.[2571304] [19-1445] [Entered: 05/23/2019 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Chanju Carrol, FILED. Service date 05/21/2019 by CM/ECF.[2568834] [19-1445] [Entered: 05/21/2019 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Chanju Carrol, FILED. Service date 05/21/2019 by CM/ECF.[2568756] [19-1445] [Entered: 05/21/2019 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2566802] [19-1445] [Entered: 05/17/2019 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 05/10/2019, RECEIVED.[2566794] [19-1445] [Entered: 05/17/2019 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Chanju Carrol, FILED. [2566786] [19-1445] [Entered: 05/17/2019 03:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
