Shomo v. Heath
| Jose J. Shomo |
| Philip Heath, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility |
| 19-146 |
| January 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 PAPERS, motion for reconsideration, on behalf of Petitioner Jose J. Shomo received in a closed case, RETURNED.[2518983] [19-146] [Entered: 03/15/2019 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 23 PAPERS, motion for reconsideration, on behalf of Petitioner Jose J. Shomo, RECEIVED.[2518981] [19-146] [Entered: 03/15/2019 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 22 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 03/08/2019, determining the appeal to SDNY, copy to pro se, ISSUED.[Mandate][2513655] [19-146] [Entered: 03/08/2019 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 21 MOTION ORDER, denying motion to file successive petition [ # 3 ] filed by Petitioner Jose J. Shomo, by BDP, DC, RJS, copy to pro se, FILED. [2496918][21] [19-146] [Entered: 02/14/2019 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 20 NEW CASE MANAGER, Margaret Lain, ASSIGNED.[2496915] [19-146] [Entered: 02/14/2019 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY, Karen Schlossberg, [ # 16 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[2487656] [19-146] [Entered: 02/01/2019 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent Philip Heath, FILED. Service date 02/01/2019 by US mail. [2487233] [19-146] [Entered: 02/01/2019 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE, to Respondent Philip Heath , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2485326] [19-146] [Entered: 01/30/2019 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Jose J. Shomo, FILED. Service date 01/24/2019 by US mail.[2485314] [19-146] [Entered: 01/30/2019 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2478979] [19-146] [Entered: 01/22/2019 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2475614] [19-146] [Entered: 01/15/2019 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION, to file successive petition, on behalf of Petitioner Jose J. Shomo, FILED. Service date 01/06/2019 by US mail.[2475601] [19-146] [Entered: 01/15/2019 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF, transferred from U.S. District Court, FILED. Notice to Petitioner Jose J. Shomo, requiring filing of application form for second or successive petition, SENT.[2475586] [19-146] [Entered: 01/15/2019 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, on behalf of Petitioner Jose J. Shomo, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED.[2475580] [19-146] [Entered: 01/15/2019 01:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Shomo v. Heath | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jose J. Shomo | |
| Represented By: | Jose J. Shomo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Philip Heath, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility | |
| Represented By: | Karen Schlossberg Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
