Ash v. Thoms
Petitioner: Jamel Ash
Respondent: Matthew Thoms
Case Number: 19-1491
Filed: May 21, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2019 Filing 19 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 07/16/2019, determining the appeal to EDNY, ISSUED.[Mandate][2609704] [19-1491] copy sent to pro se.--[Edited 07/16/2019 by RO] [Entered: 07/16/2019 12:12 PM]
July 16, 2019 Filing 18 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to withdraw the appeal [ # 15 ] filed by Petitioner Jamel Ash, copy sent to pro se, FILED. [2609698][18] [19-1491]--[Edited 07/16/2019 by RO] [Entered: 07/16/2019 12:10 PM]
July 16, 2019 Filing 17 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL [ # 15 ], on behalf of Petitioner Jamel Ash, FILED.[2609692] [19-1491] [Entered: 07/16/2019 12:08 PM]
July 9, 2019 Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [9], on behalf of Petitioner Jamel Ash, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[2602852] [19-1491] [Entered: 07/09/2019 10:09 AM]
July 3, 2019 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Jamel Ash, FILED. No service date.[2602846] [19-1491] [Entered: 07/09/2019 10:07 AM]
June 11, 2019 Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, to withdraw appeal, [7], on behalf of Petitioner Jamel Ash, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED.[2584733] [19-1491] [Entered: 06/11/2019 03:10 PM]
June 10, 2019 Filing 15 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Petitioner Jamel Ash, FILED. [2609685] [19-1491] [Entered: 07/16/2019 12:07 PM]
June 10, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Petitioner Jamel Ash, FILED. No service date.[2584728] [19-1491] [Entered: 06/11/2019 03:08 PM]
June 10, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE, to Respondent Matthew Thoms, for failure to file an appearance, copy to pro se petitioner, SENT.[2583875] [19-1491] [Entered: 06/10/2019 04:41 PM]
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER, dated 06/10/2019, dismissing appeal by 07/01/2019, unless Petitioner Jamel Ash, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED.[2583868] [19-1491] [Entered: 06/10/2019 04:38 PM]
May 21, 2019 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2571251] [19-1491] [Entered: 05/23/2019 12:22 PM]
May 21, 2019 Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Petitioner, SENT.[2571246] [19-1491] [Entered: 05/23/2019 12:19 PM]
May 21, 2019 Filing 2 SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF, transferred from U.S. District Court, FILED. Notice to Petitioner Jamel Ash, requiring filing of application form for second or successive petition, SENT.[2571242] [19-1491] [Entered: 05/23/2019 12:17 PM]
May 21, 2019 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, on behalf of Petitioner Jamel Ash, FILED.[2571228] [19-1491] [Entered: 05/23/2019 12:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ash v. Thoms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jamel Ash
Represented By: Jamel Ash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Thoms
Represented By: Barbara D. Underwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?