Williams v. County of Nassau
Nassau County Correctional Center and Nassau County Sheriff's Department |
County of Nassau, Mary Elizabeth Ostermann, in her individual and official capacity, Antonio Patino, in his individual and official capacity, Officer Phil Lonigro, in his individual and official capacity, Acting Sheriff Michael J. Sposato, in his individual and offical capacity and Sergeant Steven O'Malley, in his individual and offical capacity |
Mary Williams |
19-1867 |
June 25, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ATTORNEY, Stephen Bergstein for Mary Williams, in case 19-1867 , [ # 28 ], ADDED.[2630310] [19-1867] [Entered: 08/12/2019 04:53 PM] |
Filing 28 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Mary Williams, FILED. Service date 08/12/2019 by CM/ECF. [2630044] [19-1867] [Entered: 08/12/2019 02:50 PM] |
Filing 27 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Mary Williams Brief due date as 10/08/2019. Joint Appendix due date as 10/08/2019, FILED.[2626275] [19-1867] [Entered: 08/07/2019 11:09 AM] |
Filing 24 NEW CASE MANAGER, Khadijah Young, ASSIGNED.[2625813] [19-1867] [Entered: 08/06/2019 04:40 PM] |
Filing 20 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Mary Williams, informing Court of proposed due date 10/08/2019, RECEIVED. Service date 08/01/2019 by CM/ECF.[2622205] [19-1867] [Entered: 08/01/2019 01:34 PM] |
Filing 18 ATTORNEY, Deanna Panico for Phil Lonigro Michael J. Sposato Mary Elizabeth Ostermann Steven O'Malley Antonio Patino, in case 19-1867, [ # 17 ], ADDED.[2620762] [19-1867] [Entered: 07/30/2019 05:29 PM] |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee County of Nassau, Phil Lonigro, Phil Lonigro, Steven O'Malley, Mary Elizabeth Ostermann, Antonio Patino, Michael J. Sposato and -- Nassau County Correctional Center and Nassau County Sheriff's Department, FILED. Service date 07/29/2019 by CM/ECF. [2619343] [19-1867] [Entered: 07/29/2019 02:35 PM] |
Filing 16 CAMP ORDER, Type of Conference: Amended Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 08/01/2019, Start Time: 11:30 AM, Required Attendees: Clients with Counsel, with Kathleen M. Scanlon, ENTERED.[2619308] [19-1867] [Entered: 07/29/2019 02:18 PM] |
Filing 15 CAMP ORDER, Type of Conference: Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 08/01/2019, Start Time: 10:30 AM, Required Attendees: Clients with Counsel, with Kathleen M. Scanlon, ENTERED.[2606279] [19-1867] [Entered: 07/11/2019 04:06 PM] |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Mary Williams, FILED. Service date 07/09/2019 by CM/ECF.[2603526] [19-1867] [Entered: 07/09/2019 03:25 PM] |
Filing 9 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Mary Williams, FILED. Service date 07/09/2019 by CM/ECF.[2603460] [19-1867] [Entered: 07/09/2019 03:02 PM] |
Filing 8 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Mary Williams, FILED. Service date 07/09/2019 by CM/ECF.[2603456] [19-1867] [Entered: 07/09/2019 03:00 PM] |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2596186] [19-1867] [Entered: 06/27/2019 01:53 PM] |
Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Mary Williams, district court receipt # ANYEDC-11604688, FILED.[2596185] [19-1867] [Entered: 06/27/2019 01:52 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 05/28/2019, RECEIVED.[2596184] [19-1867] [Entered: 06/27/2019 01:51 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 03/30/2017, RECEIVED.[2596183] [19-1867] [Entered: 06/27/2019 01:50 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Mary Williams, FILED. [2596178] [19-1867] [Entered: 06/27/2019 01:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.