Cordova-Garcia v. Barr
| Veda Raquel Cordova-Garcia, Edin Orlando Gonzalez-Garcia, Keilin Raquel Cordova and Vivian Aracely Milian-Cordova |
| Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General |
| 19-217 |
| January 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 TOLLING CANCELLATION ORDER, FILED. [2518777] [19-217] [Entered: 03/15/2019 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 21 IMMIGRATION TOLLING CANCELLATION LETTER, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 03/15/2019 by CM/ECF. [2518704] [19-217] [Entered: 03/15/2019 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 20 CAPTION, pursuant to FRAP 43(c)(2), AMENDED.[2509768] [19-217] [Entered: 03/04/2019 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 19 Matthew G. Whitaker, RESPONDENT, replaced by William P. Barr, Respondent, SUBSTITUTED.[2509766] [19-217] [Entered: 03/04/2019 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 18 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [2501443] [19-217] [Entered: 02/21/2019 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 17 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ON APPEAL, FILED.[2501327] [19-217] [Entered: 02/21/2019 08:03 AM] |
| Filing 16 NEW CASE MANAGER, Jasmine Beard, ASSIGNED.[2491615] [19-217] [Entered: 02/07/2019 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 12 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM C/A [ # 10 ], [ # 11 ], on behalf of Petitioner Keilin Raquel Cordova, Veda Raquel Cordova-Garcia, Edin Orlando Gonzalez-Garcia and Vivian Aracely Milian-Cordova, FILED.[2491401] [19-217] [Entered: 02/07/2019 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 11 FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Veda Raquel Cordova-Garcia, Vivian Aracely Milian-Cordova, Keilin Raquel Cordova and Edin Orlando Gonzalez-Garcia, FILED. Service date 02/06/2019 by CM/ECF.[2491265] [19-217] [Entered: 02/06/2019 11:26 PM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C/A, [9], on behalf of Petitioner Keilin Raquel Cordova, Veda Raquel Cordova-Garcia, Edin Orlando Gonzalez-Garcia and Vivian Aracely Milian-Cordova, FILED.[2488366] [19-217] [Entered: 02/04/2019 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 9 FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner Veda Raquel Cordova-Garcia, Vivian Aracely Milian-Cordova, Keilin Raquel Cordova and Edin Orlando Gonzalez-Garcia, FILED. Service date 02/01/2019 by CM/ECF.[2487922] [19-217] [Entered: 02/01/2019 09:44 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Veda Raquel Cordova-Garcia, Vivian Aracely Milian-Cordova, Keilin Raquel Cordova and Edin Orlando Gonzalez-Garcia, FILED. Service date 02/01/2019 by CM/ECF.[2487921] [19-217] [Entered: 02/01/2019 09:33 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Jacob Bashyrov, [ # 6 ], in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED.[2480557] [19-217] [Entered: 01/23/2019 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker, FILED. Service date 01/23/2019 by CM/ECF. [2480204] [19-217] [Entered: 01/23/2019 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [2479727] [19-217] [Entered: 01/22/2019 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Keilin Raquel Cordova, Veda Raquel Cordova-Garcia, Edin Orlando Gonzalez-Garcia and Vivian Aracely Milian-Cordova, USCA receipt # A02-72105-353, FILED.[2479726] [19-217] [Entered: 01/22/2019 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 12/21/2018, RECEIVED.[2479721] [19-217] [Entered: 01/22/2019 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Keilin Raquel Cordova, Veda Raquel Cordova-Garcia, Edin Orlando Gonzalez-Garcia and Vivian Aracely Milian-Cordova, FILED. [2479705] [19-217] [Entered: 01/22/2019 04:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
