In Re: Todd Bank
Petitioner: Todd C. Bank, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated
Respondent: Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC, Cogint, Inc. and Fluent, LLC
Case Number: 19-219
Filed: January 17, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION, to issue mandate forthwith, on behalf of Petitioner Todd C. Bank, FILED. Service date 01/24/2019 by CM/ECF. [2482025] [19-219] [Entered: 01/24/2019 05:53 PM]
January 24, 2019 Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Todd C. Bank, FILED. Service date 01/24/2019 by CM/ECF.[2481443] [19-219] [Entered: 01/24/2019 11:45 AM]
January 24, 2019 Filing 7 PETITION FOR WRIT, SERVED. Service date 01/23/2019 by email.[2481071] [19-219] [Entered: 01/24/2019 08:52 AM]
January 24, 2019 Filing 6 CURED DEFECTIVE WRIT OF MANDAMUS [1], on behalf of Petitioner Todd C. Bank, FILED.[2481064] [19-219] [Entered: 01/24/2019 08:50 AM]
January 24, 2019 Filing 5 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, on behalf of Petitioner Todd C. Bank, FILED.[2481056] [19-219] [Entered: 01/24/2019 08:45 AM]
January 23, 2019 Filing 4 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Writ of Mandamus, [1], on behalf of Petitioner Todd C. Bank, FILED.[2479987] [19-219] [Entered: 01/23/2019 09:54 AM]
January 23, 2019 Filing 3 PETITION FOR WRIT, SERVED. Service date 01/07/2018 by US mail.[2479979] [19-219] [Entered: 01/23/2019 09:52 AM]
January 17, 2019 Filing 2 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Todd C. Bank, USCA receipt # A02-72096-507, FILED.[2479969] [19-219] [Entered: 01/23/2019 09:48 AM]
January 17, 2019 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, on behalf of Petitioner Todd C. Bank, FILED.[2479963] [19-219] [Entered: 01/23/2019 09:45 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In Re: Todd Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Todd C. Bank, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated
Represented By: Todd C. Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Fluent, Inc.
Represented By: Neil Asnen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Reward Zone USA, LLC
Represented By: Neil Asnen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cogint, Inc.
Represented By: Neil Asnen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Fluent, LLC
Represented By: Neil Asnen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?