Ramos v. East Hartford
| Jason Kaplan, Officer, Scott M. Sansom, Chief of the East Hartford Police Department and Town of East Hartford |
| Jason Cohen, Officer and James Lis, Sergeant |
| Wilson Ramos, As Administrator of the Estate of Jose A. Maldonado, and individually |
| 19-2197 |
| July 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Zachary Phillipps for Wilson Ramos, in case 19-2197, [ # 8 ], ADDED.[2617682] [19-2197] [Entered: 07/26/2019 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Wilson Ramos, FILED. Service date 07/26/2019 by CM/ECF. [2617633] [19-2197] [Entered: 07/26/2019 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Wilson Ramos, FILED. Service date 07/26/2019 by CM/ECF.[2617613] [19-2197] [Entered: 07/26/2019 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Jason Cohen and James Lis, FILED. Service date 07/22/2019 by CM/ECF.[2614151] [19-2197] [Entered: 07/22/2019 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Jason Cohen and James Lis, district court receipt # ACTDC-5364367, FILED.[2612882] [19-2197] [Entered: 07/19/2019 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM DECISION, dated 07/02/2019, RECEIVED.[2612880] [19-2197] [Entered: 07/19/2019 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jason Cohen and James Lis, FILED. [2612876] [19-2197] [Entered: 07/19/2019 01:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
